JLN

Jacqui Lambie Network

1 current federal parliamentarians across 1 states and territories.

Explore this party in the network
Parliament share
0.4%
House
0
Senate
1
Jurisdictions
1 / 8

Where Jacqui Lambie Network stands on the issues

Recorded policy questions matched to voting records for current Jacqui Lambie Network parliamentarians. Each percentage belongs to one policy question; this is not a party manifesto or future promise.

Stale snapshotretrieved 22 August 2026Policy reporting period: unknownThey Vote For You was unavailable; retained the last-known policy positions.

Each percentage is a separate policy-level mean for current members who could be scored. Policies are not averaged into one topic stance.

JavaScript is needed to switch the selected topic. Open a topic below to browse its evidence.

Climate & energy
  • A carbon price40% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should introduce a carbon pricing mechanism

  • Increasing investment in renewable energy50% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should increase investment in renewable energy technologies

  • Increasing investment in the coal industry60% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should maintain or increase its investment in and support for the Australian coal industry

  • Banning new thermal coal mines40% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should put a ban on new thermal coal mines opening in Australia

  • Ending government investment in fossil fuels40% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should stop all investment in fossil fuels

  • Net zero emissions by 205080% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change

Integrity
  • Creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission80% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should create a national integrity commission similar to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to detect…

  • Protecting whistleblowers40% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should introduce legislation to protect people who disclose information for the benefit of the public interest and protect the…

Environment
  • Unconventional gas mining50% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas

  • Protecting the Great Barrier Reef40% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations

Immigration
  • Implementing refugee and protection conventions60% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should implement the international conventions that relate to seeking refuge and protection from torture. These include the Convention…

  • Regional processing of asylum seekers40% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: asylum seekers who arrive in Australia without a visa, particularly those who arrive by boat, should have their asylum claims processed regionally in a…

Welfare
  • Decreasing availability of welfare payments60% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should limit the availability of government social security payments

  • Increasing the Newstart Allowance rate60% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should increase the Newstart Allowance rate to ensure that it covers basic living costs

Education
  • Increasing funding for university education100% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should increase funding for university education

Democracy
  • Restricting donations to political parties60% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should introduce restrictions to the amount and type of donations that political parties can receive in order to prevent corruption or…

Civil liberties
  • Increasing surveillance powers60% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should introduce legislation to increase the powers of intelligence and law enforcement agencies to intercept and retain communications…

Industrial relations
  • Increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace100% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the powers and influence of trade unions in workplace relations

Rights
  • Transgender rights40% support · 1 current members scoredSmall sample: fewer than 5 current members were scored, so this mean can move sharply.

    Policy question: the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies…

Methodology: Party support is the mean of current members' per-policy agreement with They Vote For You buckets (consistently for = 1.0, almost always for = 0.8, generally for = 0.6, mixture = 0.5, generally against = 0.4, almost always against = 0.2, consistently against = 0.0). Members whose voting record is insufficient for They Vote For You to classify are excluded. Former parliamentarians are excluded; only the validated current roster is counted. Source: TheyVoteForYou

Current federal Parliament

Federal parliamentary footprint

See where Jacqui Lambie Network is represented, then select a region for detail.

Parliamentary chamber
WA0NT0SA0QLD0NSW0VIC0ACT0TAS1
Current sourced roles

People shaping the party

Party leadership and current senior federal office holders appear first.

View all 1 people
1Jacqui LambieJacqui Lambie Network Whip in the SenateTAS Senator

Party orientation

Sourced descriptors, not a WhoRunsAus score.

  • Classification review pending.

No orientation descriptors have passed source review for this profile yet.

Last reviewed 31 July 2026

Funding transparency

No imported return

No verified AEC preview is imported for this profile yet.

Disclosed receipt sample

Top grouped Donation Received records from the bounded 2024-25 ALP scope.

No verified receipt records are imported yet.

Disclosure records show reported receipts; they do not by themselves establish influence.

Policy agenda

Public platforms and commitments with an observable source.

No policy records have passed source review for this profile yet.

Controversies & accountability

Evidence-led records that separate allegations, responses, findings and actions.

No sourced accountability events are published for this profile yet.

Inclusion requires a dated public source and a clearly recorded evidence status. Allegations are never presented as findings.

Sourced faction coverage

No sourced faction1

Adapted from the specific Wikipedia faction lists below under CC BY-SA 4.0; names are normalised and conflicting claims are excluded.

Source: Wikidata retrieved 31 August 2026 CC0 1.0